Read more

HHS recently announced more than $700 million in behavioral health, addiction, homelessness, and crisis-response funding, including support for Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinics (CCBHCs), 988 crisis services, recovery programs, and the new STREETS initiative focused on individuals experiencing homelessness with serious mental illness or substance use disorders.

Across the package, HHS is investing in:

• crisis response

• community behavioral health capacity

• recovery services

• homelessness response

• cross-sector coordination

But as behavioral health systems expand, the ability to move people successfully between organizations becomes more important, and I’ve been thinking less about where the money is going and more about what happens after it arrives.

The funding expands behavioral health capacity. It expands crisis response capacity. It expands community-based services. It expands outreach to populations that have historically struggled to stay connected to care. What it does not automatically expand is the infrastructure required to move people successfully through those systems.

Which is why I think this $700M increases the value of organizations that support navigation, referrals, care transitions, engagement, and follow-up:

Read more

I spent the day listening to the federal PTAC (Physician-Focused Payment Model Technical Advisory Committee) meeting on patient safety and value-based care.

Read more

On June 1, CMS released implementation guidance for Medicaid community engagement requirements that take effect January 1, 2027. The rule requires affected states to verify that certain Medicaid beneficiaries meet 80 hours per month of qualifying work or community engagement activities and to establish processes for exemptions, renewals, and documentation. [ See: CMS Interim Final Rule Fact Sheet]

The strange thing about healthcare is that the most important shifts rarely announce themselves as shifts. They arrive disguised as paperwork, compliance requirements, quality measures, reporting standards, documentation requests, pilot programs, contract language, and operational headaches. Everyone experiences them as isolated annoyances. Few people stop to ask what they are collectively pointing toward. What I want to show you in this article is that many of the changes currently unfolding across Medicaid, Food as Medicine, social care, and value-based care are not separate stories at all. They are pieces of the same story. Once you see the pattern, it's difficult to unsee. The debates become easier to understand. The winners become easier to identify. The investments start making more sense. Most importantly, you gain a clearer view of where healthcare is actually headed while everyone else is still arguing about the symptoms. That kind of visibility won't make the coming changes less consequential. It does make them easier to prepare for.

SCALE IS TRUST, MULTIPLIED

So why am I, a seasoned Licensed Master Social Worker and healthcare frontline operator / night shift hero, on the internet talking to you, and in front of hundreds of Food Is Medicine professionals, policymakers and leaders, about ROI?

Steven King, the writer of some of the most prevailing classics in film and literature in both horror and crime/conspiracy fiction is famously quoted on his thoughts about what makes good writing. It’s not what you think. Here’s what he said:

↳ Yes, this is the philosophy that gave us The Shawshank Redemption.

The Green Mile. Stand By Me. Killer Clowns that strangely made us reflect on the nature of fear itself. And at first this quote sounds utterly drab.Like something you’d have expected from Logan Roy or the cigar-chomping editor from Spiderman over his feet on a cold shiny desk. Until you recognize the underpinnings of his classic framework. It turns out that these stories that have shaped popular culture for the last few decades actually have a shared theme: Every story starts with ONE thing wrong. Then recognition of said thing. The suppression of that recognition by the status quo/collective. And with the increasing suppression comes increasing severity of said Wrong Thing.

That’s it. That’s the formula you see everywhere.

My point here is that 1) scale shapes entire collectives. It not only meets the standard, but it surpasses it and becomes the new standard. It sets the expectations for everything that comes after it. And 2) scale starts with a repeatable framework and 3) that framework is tied to some fundamental/authentic aspect of the human experience.

For Carrie and It , it was the existential questions of the psyche. For social care organizations, it’s TRUST.

Trust is the micro version of scale. Building and maintaining of trust in the clinical environment says, I’m a safe space for you. You can rely on me. I see you.

Scale in social care is the mechanism for trust, at a system-wide level. If you know my work, you know my biggest enemy is Zombie Care (staying with the horror motif!). That is, organizations that are insufficient, unreliable, and insolvent yet still embedded within operational workflows. Social care organizations that create more problems (more paperwork, more risk, more operational friction) than they solve for the healthcare systems (and even for the patient) they are embedded within.

Think of the nonprofit that never seems to get your fax. The operator with so much tedious outdated paperwork intake that exhausts someone away from care before they even get started. The non-emergency medical transport that never picks up the patient in time for her dialysis. The holding line that promises that your call is very important to us (SO important that they never answer!). The food bank filled with day-old donuts and black bananas and stale crackers. The stuff that no one wants, but as a social worker I had to keep referring patients to because no one at the high level ever thought to actually investigate on whether these social care referrals were effectively solving problems OR just checking a box for liability.

Good social care, I have found starts with solving the question of how to make a good intention/good intervention real in a patient’s life. Can they eat the food in the food box, mechanically- as in, do they have teeth? Can they swallow? Can they prepare it? Do they have a caregiver to help them? Was it sent to the right address? How do we make sure they answered the door? How do we make sure it was consumed as designed to actually produce the outcome you were aiming for? (Tailor these questions to your specific program. But you get the idea.)

The most clinically robust intervention is effectively useless if it cannot reach the patient reliably enough to produce good outcomes. And without good outcomes, you cannot generate an ROI, and most likely the organization will not survive renewal, because will not deliver on it’s contracts, and will not survive long-term.

So in a sense, good social care is the one that scales.

Not because scale is the goal.

Because scale is evidence that the intervention can be trusted to reach people consistently, produce meaningful outcomes, and remain available long after the pilot funding, grants, conference presentations, and good intentions have faded.

As we saw in the 80’s with hospice (or just a few years ago with Hospital at Home) a model that combines human dignity, with sensible and solid business logic, and a repeatable model and results, takes what used to be something that “just made sense” into a legitimate part healthcare. Something we now can’t imagine healthcare without.

Scale doesn’t break trust, clinical integrity, or meaning in the life of any patient.

After all, no one was ever LESS moved (or less freaked out, depending on the story) by a Stephen King work just because it happened to also reach millions.

It amplifies it, so that it can reach thousands instead of hundreds. It becomes part of the healthcare system itself, and it changes how we think of the industry as a whole.

I used to think that scale had nothing to do with improving social risk factors in clinical outcomes.

But time has taught me that behind every spreadsheet, contract, and budget decision is a patient whose access depends on whether the intervention survives.

Subscribe now

VERIFICATION IS BECOMING AN OPERATING FUNCTION

Read more

Arizona announced on May 14, 2026 that AHCCCS will launch an AI-informed Medicaid prepayment review system in response to CMS’ directive for all states to revalidate high-risk Medicaid providers. The system will rank claims for fraud, waste, and abuse risk before payment; high-risk claims will receive human review, while compliant providers may see fast…

Read more

Read more

• Deferral of approximately $259.5 million in quarterly federal Medicaid funding to Minnesota pending fraud review

• Nationwide moratorium on new Medicare enrollment for certain DMEPOS suppliers

• Launch of the CRUSH (Comprehensive Regulations to Uncover Suspicious Healthcare) initiative, expanding AI-based pre-pa…

Read more

Why this matters: If your program (HRSN/ILOS, withholds, risk corridors, directed payments) can’t be d…

Read more

SCAN Health Plan is piloting a program to train Medicare Advantage brokers to function as care navigators—embedding structured guidance, plan engagement, and benefit steering earlier in the member journey. The model expands broker influence beyond enrollment into ongoing utilization touchpoints, includi…

Read more

Federal Register | CMS Submits Medicare Advantage Information Collections for OMB Review

CMS published a 30-day Paperwork Reduction Act notice advancing Medicare Advantage information collections to the Office of Management and Budget, detailing updated reporting elements, submission frequency, and burden estimates tied to MA encounter and quality infras…

Read more

Read more

Read more

Several February 2026 provider-facing updates reflect increased standardization of prior authorization and concurrent review mechanics across SNF, IRF, LTAC, and home health settings—including vendor centralization, clarified documentation thresholds, and defined authoriza…

Read more

Read more

CMS released a cluster of filings February 10–11 opening 30–60 day comment windows while restoring a five-month RADV medical-record submission window and tightening record packaging standards.

The shift expands audit exposure inside the 2026 operating cycle and raises the tolerance threshold for …

Read more

Aetna is consolidating post-discharge follow-up inside plan operations through a digital-first onboarding workflow that accelerates outreach, medication access, and care plan activation. The move strengthens near-term auditability and Stars posture …

Read more

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services finalized the Preserving Medicaid Funding for Vulnerable Populations—Closing a Health Care-Related Tax Loophole rule, limiting how states use health-care-related provider taxes to generate Medicaid financing. Th…

Read more

Closed-loop referral platforms are everywhere now.

They’re written into contracts.
They show up in RFPs.
They’re treated like table stakes in Medicaid, Medicare Advantage, and health-system SDOH strategy.

In a lot of places, they’re no longer optional.

What is optional, at least for now, is how carefully we decide to move forward.

This edition is for that moment before someone has to explain, two years from now, why something that sounded reasonable became a problem.

If you’re thinking about closed loop referral platforms right now, this edition will help you decide whether moving forward right now, in the way it’s usually structured, is defensible later.

what this is not about

This edition is not trying to decide whether closed-loop referral improves access, whether community participation exists, whether reporting requirements can technically be met, or whether the platform aligns with policy language.

Those questions are important, they’re just not enough anymore.

The question here is whether the operating and financial logic holds up once real life shows up:

• partial utilization

• stalled referrals

• workforce gaps

• audits

• renewals

a few shortcuts that keep causing trouble

There are a handful of assumptions that feel reasonable and routinely break later.

They usually sound like this:

• “Closed loop” means the money is closed, too

• A confirmed referral means the service actually happened

• A dashboard equals an audit trail

• Policy-required infrastructure must be underwritable

None of those are reliably true.

This edition treats them as separate gates, not interchangeable wins.

the survivability test

Use this checklist at moments when a decision is forming but has not yet locked. It is most effective before procurement language is finalized, before renewals are assumed, and before expansions are justified by momentum rather than structure. Typical use cases include early vendor selection, scope expansion discussions, pre-renewal reviews, and internal alignment conversations where risk is felt but not yet articulated.

Run the checklist quickly and directionally. You are not scoring or completing it exhaustively. As you read each prompt, note the signal that feels most accurate in the current state, not the aspirational one. One or two unclear signals indicate areas to tighten. Multiple unclear signals indicate timing risk and suggest pausing until ownership, documentation, or governance is resolved.

This checklist works best as:

• a solo pre-read, to clarify your own position before a meeting

• a small-group alignment tool, to surface where assumptions diverge quietly

• a pre-renewal or pre-expansion screen, to determine whether momentum is earned

And finally, know that the ideal output is not a yes or no.

The output is readiness: clarity on what is solid, what needs definition, and whether proceeding now increases or reduces future exposure.

Read more

CMS | Medicare Advantage Advance Notice Sets Near-Term Budget Posture
CMS released the CY 2027 Medicare Advantage and Part D Advance Notice, projecting a net +0.09% payment update (~$700M) if finalized. While the payment year is future-dated, the effect is immediate. Plans have entered active bid modeling and budget reconciliation, concentrating d…

Read more

Minnesota Health Care Programs initiated off-cycle provider revalidation notices (Jan 23–28) for select high-risk service categories, requiring immediate action to maintain billing eligibility. The move introduces a near-term constraint on post-discharge service capacity during the c…

Read more